Understanding PPE standards

Published:  08 November, 2016

What are the different standards for firefighters’ PPE and why are there so many different standards bodies? Ivan Rich explains the PPE landscape and explores the latest developments, including the effect of Brexit and the role of the British Standards Institution in Europe.

Fire and emergency services across the globe need to know that they can fully rely on the safety and quality of their PPE, whether this is purchased at home or abroad.  To ensure the best level of protection, most countries demand conformity with both national and international performance standards for PPE. By insisting that any equipment purchased meets appropriate global standards, they can be assured that, at the very least, the minimum safety requirements will be met and the quality will be satisfactory. This helps to break down technical and language barriers between countries and makes it much more straightforward for manufacturers to trade goods and services.

There are currently three major standard-setting bodies on the world stage: European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) which covers Europe; the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) which covers the USA, Latin America and the Asia/Pacific region; and the International Standards Organisation (ISO) which sets standards worldwide.

In Europe, the first standard for firefighters’ PPE was introduced in 1995. Entitled EN469, it became the first PPE standard to cover all countries in the European Union, serving to strengthen overall product safety and quality, and to encourage the sharing and adoption of good practices.

The current version of EN469 is EN469: 2005. This is a harmonised standard, which means that rather than being simply voluntary, it supports essential requirements of the new EU PPE Regulation (EU 2016/425) to which all European PPE must comply by 2018.

EN469: 2005 was reviewed and updated in 2014. However, it was subsequently withdrawn from OJEU due to errors. The standard is now being reviewed and rewritten in discussion with CEN consultants, who are employed by the EU Commission to monitor and advise on standards development. I sit on a panel group formed by British Standards Institute and we recently met for the second time to discuss the revision of the standard and the list of requirements that the UK would like to see included.

The NFPA Standard for PPE has been adopted in the USA and across the world including Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. NFPA1971 was first published back in 1975 and has undergone numerous revisions since then, most recently in 2013. NFPA1971: 2013 protects firefighting personnel by establishing minimum levels of protection from thermal, physical, environmental, and blood-borne hazards encountered during structural and proximity firefighting operations. Its requirements apply to the design, performance, testing, and certification for structural firefighting. The revision process has commenced and the next edition will be published in 2018.

The original ISO standard for Protective Clothing for Firefighters, ISO 11613, was introduced in 1999. It is currently under revision and is being prepared for a Draft International Standard ballot. This revised standard will be entitled ‘Protective clothing for firefighters’ who are engaged in support activities associated with structural firefighting - Laboratory test methods and performance’.

ISO has also recently published a new ensemble standard for PPE used by firefighters, entitled ‘ISO 11999 - PPE for firefighters -Test methods and requirements for PPE used by firefighters who are at risk of exposure to high levels of heat and/or flame while fighting fires occurring in structures’. There will be ten parts to the standard - eight have been published already - with part three covering the requirements for clothing. 

It makes sense for national, European and international standards to be drafted and developed in line with each other. So wherever possible, CEN, NFPA, ISO, and many national standards bodies (NSBs) work closely together to replicate requirements. This makes adhering to standards much easier, and helps to promote global best practice by drawing on international expertise. 

Dave Matthews, who leads on a number of BSI, CEN and ISO committees, believes that it is vital for both manufacturers and end users to have a level playing field to protect against any unscrupulous suppliers of PPE.

Under the Vienna Agreement, for example, CEN has agreed to collaborate with ISO to develop a common European and international standard. More than 30% of the European standards adopted by CEN are identical to international standards. These EN/ISO standards have the dual benefits of automatic and identical implementation across Europe and globally. Some examples include EN ISO 11612:2015, which specifies minimum performance requirements for clothing to protect against heat and flame, and EN ISO 14116:2015, which details performance requirements for the limited flame spread properties of materials and protective clothing.

National standards bodies (NSBs) such as the BSI have to adopt CEN and ISO standards so that by adhering to one standard, manufacturers can easily adhere to them all. NSBs outside Europe, such as Standards Australia, often choose to adhere to ISO standards or have their own standards.

Ultimately, it is up to the customer to decide which standards they would like their PPE to follow, although clearly those in the EU would be advised to follow EN469 as it a harmonised standard and complies with EU regulations.

There are some who believe this three-tiered approach of developing national, European, and international standards is unnecessary and inefficient. In today’s global business world, why not do away with national standards and simply follow international guidelines? However, national standards are an essential fallback in countless situations, most crucially when a nation is faced with a specific scenario, or where there is strong national demand that may not be reflected internationally.

If a standard does not exist internationally, NSBs are able to create their own. For example, despite European guidance on how frequently PPE should be cleaned, Europe still rejects calls for a standard that sets criteria for the cleaning, maintenance, and repair of firefighters’ PPE.

This is an issue that many countries are taking seriously, since regular cleaning can guard against the dangerous infiltration of carcinogens, which have been linked to higher incidences of cancer among firefighters on the front line. Currently, the only standard in the world setting such criteria is NFPA1851: 2014. The UK industry in particular is keen to create a standard to help protect against these health concerns, so the BSI is working to develop a national standard to meet this demand. 

Finally, many countries in or trading with Europe are keen for an update on the consequences of the UK voting to leave the European Union, the impact this will have on the UK’s membership of CEN and its future adherence to EN standards. There has been speculation that Brexit may trigger a demotion of the UK to Affiliate Member status, currently held by 19 NSBs from EU neighbouring countries.

In response, the British Standards Institute has confirmed that it is ‘business as usual’. For the foreseeable future, it sees no change in its status and obligations as a full member of CEN, or in its membership of ISO. The BSI director of standards, Dr Scott Steedman, who also holds the position of vice president of policy at CEN, made this position clear in a recent webinar entitled ‘EU referendum – the UK’s future role in developing European standards’.

‘Our position is that it is absolutely “business as usual” for BSI. Our commitment to the European system is undiminished and our work internationally will not be distracted… We see considerable benefits in retaining the single standard model in the UK. It provides access to the largest integrated tariff-free market in the world.’

It is possible that the UK could retain full membership despite not being part of the EU, like other CEN members such as Switzerland, Norway, Macedonia, and Turkey, although it is unclear at this stage whether the UK would need to rejoin EFTA to retain its status.

Bristol Uniforms, for its part, continues to provide PPE to firefighters in over 110 countries, offering garments to meet not just EN, but NFPA and ISO standards as well. We will continue to play an active part in the development of these performance standards covering structural, wildland and technical rescue PPE.

About the author

Ivan Rich is the technical manager at Bristol Uniforms and is closely involved in developing and reviewing standards for firefighter PPE. He is the secretary for two European committees, which include standardisation for heat and flame PPE and firefighters’ PPE.

  • Operation Florian

Sign up: eMagazine & eNewsletter

The latest issues in your inbox.

Company Profiles

The ultimate in innovation, quality and service

For 60 years Lehavot has been delivering the world’s most advanced fire detection and suppression automatic systems

Trust the best, let us be your foam solution

AUXQUIMIA is a Spanish company whose main activity is the design, manufacture and commercialization of firefighting foam concentrates.

Williams Fire & Hazard Control offers a full line of specialized fire response equipment for oil and gas platforms

From storage tanks and pipeline emergencies to offshore platforms and vessels at sea, Williams' response personnel and specialized equipment quickly address adverse fire emergencies.

Foam fights fire

Europe’s foremost fire fighting foam manufacturer has been developing and producing foams since the 1920s.

Optical flame and open path gas detectors

Spectrex Inc. is a world leader in optical flame and combustible gas detection with over 30 years experience.

Revolutionizing fire fighting foam technology

The one-stop resource for fire fighting foam concentrates and custom-designed foam suppression systems hardware.

The leader in truck-mounted hydraulic platforms

Our mission is to provide the best and the safest solution to professionals that work at height.

The independent alternative

Dafo Fomtec AB is a privately owned company with head office in Stockholm Sweden and manufacturing in Helsingborg in the south of Sweden.

If you want quality, you want Zico

Since its inception Ziamatic Corp has provided the men and women of the fire service with products designed to make their jobs safer and easier.

Calendar